Mawkish for the Nonce

Friday, September 14, 2007

Unbelievable

I just saw No End In Sight. Among other things, it's left me thinking the U.S. should prosecute Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz and Rice as war criminals. Because what the film makes sort of horrifically clear is that the intention of this invasion (why call it a "war"?) was to create chaos, sustained chaos. There were systematic "mistakes" that ensured the streets would be full of enraged Iraqis with weapons. The main one was disbanding the army. Yes, the army that they've been supposedly trying to rebuild for the last few years. "We can't leave until the Iraqis are able to defend themselves" is the line. Things might be going better along these lines if they hadn't dissolved the army, cut off pay to the military and filled the streets with unemployed men who had weapons and knowledge of where bombs were.

I was stupefied. This is a very hard movie to watch. My ignorance bothered me afterwards. Why would they disband the army? Why create such an inflammatory situation? Just to have one to be in? Then I thought, was it because they didn't trust the army? They thought the army would turn against them? Well the joke's on them because the army did turn against them, but because they were turfed out. And now they're "trying to rebuild the military."

Other things the U.S. army did make them look somewhere on a par with Hitler's gang. They began to arrest insurgents, but indiscriminately, often incorrectly, knocking on doors at 2 in the morning and leading out of the house a young male who is often the only bread-winner (in the words of the film's narration). Watching Iraqi citizens being led out of their houses and stuffed into the back of trucks felt sickeningly familiar. Who did that? Oh yeah.

We destroyed a country. The people are bleeding rags. They have nothing. Except danger. Apart from the horror and death I was heartsick at how boring it all looked. What an endless dreary nightmare -- you never get to read, your stomach is never full, you're always reacting to some horror. I mean what a way is that to live? We sit over here saying "we must bring home the troops." We don't talk about how to address what we did to a country that didn't even attack us.

5 Comments:

Blogger vacuous said...

Definitely Bush and Cheney committed impeachable offenses. Engaging in a war of aggression: unconscionable and impeachable. Deliberately lying to the public, to congress and to the United Nations about the justification for war, including fabricating evidence: unconscionable and impeachable. Engaging in a war with no real understanding of Iraq, and no realistic postwar plan: unconscionable and impeachable. In fact, in regards to this last point, I've heard it said that Bush was not aware of the difference between Sunnis and Shiites when he attacked Iraq. This might be seen as another amusing instance of Bush's ignorance, but the fact is that attacking a country without first making a deep study of its sociopolitical situation is really dereliction of duty.

I think we should leave Iraq. It's true that we have broken their country, and we owe them big time, but we need to repay them on their terms, not ours. The vast majority of Iraqis want us out, and I think we should respect their wish. Gasoline may aspire to put out a fire, but it can be most helpful by leaving the area where the fire is raging.

12:36 PM

 
Blogger La Misma said...

Other impeachable offenses: violating the Geneva convention. Engaging in torture. Violating the rights of American citizens. Denying due process to American resident aliens.

I agree we should leave. How can we repay them though? Air-drop sacks of food and money? I can't think of much else.

9:38 PM

 
Blogger vacuous said...

We could allow Iraqis to emigrate to the U.S. It seems to me that's the least we could do.

6:11 AM

 
Blogger La Misma said...

Would that ever happen?

2:00 PM

 
Blogger vacuous said...

Many Iraqis want to emigrate, but we're limiting the number we let in.

6:07 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home